SUBMISSION OF ABSTRACT

The Call for Papers is announced both for peer review papers and regular/non-peer review papers.

While preparing the programme for the FIG Working Week we are aiming to cover a broad spectrum of topics in the field of surveying, covering the ten FIG technical commissions, task forces, networks and permanent institutions.

 

SUBMIT REGULAR ABSTRACT

 

SUBMIT PEER- REVIEW ABSTRACT
(closed)

 
Please note:

What is the difference between a peer review and non-peer review/regular abstract and paper?

A peer review paper is submitted to go through the substantial double-blind peer review process. This is an academic process where the paper (blinded so that the authors cannot be identified) is reviewed by 2-3 selected reviewers, who provide a substantial feedback and a rating. Based on the rating and feedback from the reviewers (blinded so the authors cannot see who the reviewers are), the authors are asked to amend the paper. After this, the paper will be reviewed by the same reviewers a  second time for a final decision on acceptance or rejection. If the peer reviewed paper is rejected, it is possible to revert it to a regular paper.

A regular/non-peer review abstract is reviewed by the Working Week technical programme board and, if accepted, is included in the technical programme. It is recommended and encouraged to submit a full paper which will be included in the proceedings. The full paper will be accepted as submitted.

How to submit 

We invite you to submit an abstract for the FIG Working Week. 
Before you begin - To submit your abstract you will need to have the following items ready: 

Submitting your abstract 

The presenting author of an abstract must be registered for the FIG Working Week by 15 January 2025.

 

SUBMIT REGULAR ABSTRACT

 

SUBMIT PEER- REVIEW ABSTRACT
(closed)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

PRESENTER

Invitation
Call for Papers
Abstract Submission
Guide for Presenters
Important dates

 

CALL FOR PAPERS

 

Check out the Call for Papers. We invite high quality contributions of researchers and practitioners.